Michael Geerts vs Yurii Dzhavakian Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Insights on the upcoming tennis match:

1. Recent form of second serve performance: Consider the recent form of the players' second serve performance. Geerts has exhibited a commendable record, triumphing in 51.1% of points on their second serve over the past six months. In contrast, Dzhavakian has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 47.68%. It is worth noting that there exists a notable correlation between this statistical metric and the accuracy of match predictions.
2. Recent return game statistics: Shed light on the players' recent return game statistics. Geerts, in recent form, has prevailed in an impressive 50.95% of their opponents' second serve points. On the other hand, Dzhavakian has displayed a higher proficiency, claiming victory in 53.62% of similar situations. The first serve return statistics also demonstrate an interesting contrast, with Geerts attaining a success rate of 30.36% while Dzhavakian stands at 35.47%. This disparity holds great relevance when predicting the favored contender in their head-to-head match.
3. Analysis of performance under pressure: Delve into the players' ability to handle pressure situations. Geerts has exhibited proficiency in saving 61.11% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Dzhavakian has demonstrated a slightly lower statistic of 59.9%. This valuable statistic aids in predicting in-game betting scenarios.
4. Performance overview of the past year: Broadly review the players' performances over the last year. Geerts has emerged victorious in 55.95% of matches played, with a win/loss record of 47/37. Conversely, Dzhavakian has demonstrated greater success, achieving a win rate of 59.6% along with a win/loss record of 59/40. These figures provide an comprehensive overview for predicting the outcome of their head-to-head encounter.
5. Optimal playing surfaces: Analyze the players' respective record on different playing surfaces. Geerts has exhibited their highest career surface win percentage on Hard, triumphing in 62% of matches played (W/L 173/105). In contrast, their performance on Grass stands at 0%, failing to secure a victory in any of the two matches played (W/L 0/2). Dzhavakian, on the other hand, has achieved their best career surface win percentage on Indoor Hard with a success rate of 67% (W/L 6/3). Conversely, their performance on Clay has been relatively weaker, attaining a win rate of 53% (W/L 102/89).
6. Player level analysis: Evaluate the level at which the players compete. Geerts has predominantly participated in Challenger/ITF tournaments above $10K, achieving a win rate of 47.17% (W/L 25/28). In contrast, Dzhavakian has mainly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a similar financial range, boasting a commendable win rate of 62.35% (W/L 53/32). When comparing statistics between players to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the relative event level they have been participating in.
7. Opponent quality statistics: Scrutinize the caliber of opponents faced by the players. Over the past 12 months, Geerts has encountered opponents with an average rank of 392.45, while Dzhavakian has competed against rivals with an average rank of 443.45.
8. Deciding set performance: Reflect on the players' performance in deciding sets. Geerts has had a success rate of 46% in winning deciding sets over the past year, while Dzhavakian has demonstrated a higher proficiency, prevailing in 59% of all matches played on tour. This information proves crucial for live predictions and betting scenarios.
9. Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performances provide insights, it is also imperative to evaluate current event statistics to discern players in good form. For up-to-date indications about the players' current performance, refer to the section below (eventStats) if they have already competed in the current event. Additionally, some players exhibit better performance at specific events, and such tendencies should be considered when predicting the final outcome.
10. Break point conversion: Consider recent break point conversion rates. Geerts has capitalized on 42.02% of breakpoint opportunities, while Dzhavakian has successfully converted 47.02% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic proves valuable for in-game live betting tips when either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
11. Should you be interested in models that accurately forecast tennis matches, you may find this article to be an informative starting point. (Warning: Intended for statistics enthusiasts)